The Baboon has been going mad-er day-by-day and his babbling is the only thing which has prevented his total mental breakdown.It is the special subject of morality which has baked his brains into a plum cake.
The Baboon realises that morality is relative. It is different for every monkey, slug and elephant.
Morality doesn’t exist in the world. It is created by our morbid minds.
That is precisely the reason why some cultures find human sacrifice as a way to appease Gods and some others define it to be an abominable crime.
What is good and what is bad for the society is based on which moral codes have managed to gain acceptance and influence with the majority.
But does this mean that anything goes?
Or should this subjectivism just lead to empty, meaningless nihilism?
Before the Baboon wrecks his head by banging it on a stone, or it spontaneously explodes, he should make something clear.
The Baboon agrees that moral codes have traditionally been used as a tool for power and control.
The interests of the moral codes preached by the society is often not good for the whole society, but the profit and privilege for the minority elites.
Moral codes frequently create social norms which seek to confine individuals in a fixed identity, creating group divisions while eliminating any difference.
The most efficient example of both of these are gender norms and the morality based on it.
In a patriarchal society, morality often has double standards which favours males — like the importance of female chastity is often paramount, while males are allowed more social freedom. It is often OK for males to have premarital, or even extramarital, sex; a woman is often labelled as a ‘whore’ or even stone pelted in the same situation.
Gender and gender norms first divide the population into two genders, homogenise their identities and behaviours of individuals inside each gender, and finally exclude individuals who are different like the people belonging to the LGBTQ community.
Morality and moral codes of the society have never been good for the society.
But does this mean we abandon the concept of morality altogether?
Or does the subjectivity of morality makes everything right?
Does this mean Nazism, slavery, colonialism and patriarchy become al right?
In what the intellectual brains like to call as post-modernism, this seems to be exactly the battle call — “Anything goes”.
But this only seems to be true in arguments, debates and discussions.
Experience assertively differs.
Can we really justify the experience of those who were slaughtered under the Nazi regime? Can we justify the experience of the slaves? Can we justify the experience of the colonised? Can we justify the experience of the victims of patriarchy?
At least, the Baboon can’t.
And this is precisely the base of the Baboon’s morality — experience.
It is only through the experience of a situation that we can ascertain the morality of the situation. There maybe nothing right in any situation, but there are things which cannot be justified, and hence, are wrong.
We have arrived at a point of moral emptiness only because of too much chat-chat and not much experience. Because most of our experiences are virtual we have lost our touch with life itself.
That is why some people can parody the 9/11 in an online image board, while people who had actually experienced it still get nightmares even after 13 years.
The Baboon rejects traditional structures of morality.
This in no way means that the Baboon doesn’t believe in morality.
The Baboon believes that every situation is unique in itself, and ethical theory is defunct because it often generalises situations and forms rules according to it like a wannabe science.
That is why moral codes don’t work.
Morality is an individual activity.
It should be based on empathy, rationality and intuition, rather than traditional bullshit.
This is because tradition ascribes the label of right to things which cannot be justified through empathy like marital rape, honour killings or burning people at stake.
Morality should be a reaction to a situation rather than blind following of rules.
The Baboon believes in the Moral Compass but not in Moral Codes.
Morality is subjective and may change from person to person, according to different situations.
This in no way means an individual should forsake morality altogether.
And here ends the Baboon Banter on Morality.
Eat your cupcakes!
— X —
The Baboon apologises for being late.
The world was on the brink of a nuclear war.
Or maybe the Baboon just had a bad dream.
The Baboon loves you.